Relationship Break Up – 2 Schools Of Thought
Ending A Relationship is by No Means Simple so is There a Right Manner to do It?
Take control of your romance
3 Secrets To Making Time For Romance
Romance is over. Long live romance!
5 Ways to Keep the Romance Alive
How to Make Her Fall in Love with Me Again
How You Can Restore The Trust After An Affair
Secondly, Kallio et al pertains to traditional hypnosis NOT “conversational hypnosis” which what some of the PUA gurus claim to be performing. There is one paper that suggests a traditional, somnambulistic hypnotic state may exist. There zero papers that indicate that conversational hypnosis exists.
Thirdly, even if there were such a thing as a hypnotic state that would in no way demonstrate that attraction can be created.
Piotr says:
November 19, 2011 at 9:40 am
There is no evidence for the model of consciousness that your (Jeffries’) theory implies. Further, implicit in the model is the notion of the subject as passive automaton. You can’t cause attraction — that is the grand myth that you have imbibed. You simply don’t have access to the parts of the brain (the most primitive parts) that are responsible for attraction — they are entirely out of reach and they don’t understand stories or “language patterns”.
Ending A Relationship is by No Means Simple so is There a Right Manner to do It?
Take control of your romance
3 Secrets To Making Time For Romance
Romance is over. Long live romance!
5 Ways to Keep the Romance Alive
How to Make Her Fall in Love with Me Again
How You Can Restore The Trust After An Affair
Secondly, Kallio et al pertains to traditional hypnosis NOT “conversational hypnosis” which what some of the PUA gurus claim to be performing. There is one paper that suggests a traditional, somnambulistic hypnotic state may exist. There zero papers that indicate that conversational hypnosis exists.
Thirdly, even if there were such a thing as a hypnotic state that would in no way demonstrate that attraction can be created.
Piotr says:
November 19, 2011 at 9:40 am
There is no evidence for the model of consciousness that your (Jeffries’) theory implies. Further, implicit in the model is the notion of the subject as passive automaton. You can’t cause attraction — that is the grand myth that you have imbibed. You simply don’t have access to the parts of the brain (the most primitive parts) that are responsible for attraction — they are entirely out of reach and they don’t understand stories or “language patterns”.
Se connecter pour commenter.
Commentaires